Believe it or not...

http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/9467/releasedateleaked160520.jpg

Fake. There aren't 16 months in a year!

---

Q u o t e:
In Europe it's DD-MM-YYYY actually. Well at least where I am from it is, might not be the same all over Europe.

---

Oh, ok, thanks for the info... ..

---

Q u o t e:
Which is more logical anyway.

---

It's more sequential, but, when hearing or reading a date it's actually more logically information driven to the way we speak dates to have MM-DD-YY.

In DD-MM-YYYY format you have to work to piece the information together.

Yeah the party is on 5-
"5 what? I have to wait for the next bit of info to give this any context."
11
"Oh ok, November. November 5th."
2010
"Ok, November 5th 2010."

In MM-DD-YYYY format it translates directly to the way dates are spoken (and thus thought of).

Yeah the party is on 11
"Ok, November"
5
"November 5th."
2010
"THAT WUS EEZIER"

---

Q u o t e:
WEAK JUSTIFICATIOOOOOON!

So anything else you'd like to officially announce besides your inability to understand different dating schemes?

(quoting pre-edit version. you can hide nothing from us, Bashiok)

---

I think I understand them just fine. I await your rebuttal.

---

Q u o t e:

It might have been witty to misinterpret the date notation, but subsequently trying to justify your sarcasm makes you seem like you actually fell for it.

---

I'm just super confused at this point.

My first post was a joke. Obviously. And then... what are you talking about now?

---

Q u o t e:
im pretty sure hes just messin with you about how it almost seems like you really did fall for if because you justified your misunderstanding.

---

Ooooooh. I wasn't justifying anything, I was dropping science on Rainfire for why (at least I think) MM-DD-YY makes more sense since he said DD-MM-YY is more logical.