First off let me state, that everything Blizzard has done so far looks wonderful.

This is not me pointing out what they should have done, or may do.

Funny as it may seem i also started a thread concerning the female barbarian as well,

but what that post failed to fluster opinions this one will triumph I hope!

What I want to know is your opinions on sex appeal in diablo 3. We had the amazon in d2, and the sorc wasn't horrid looking either.




I know that the female wd has not been released, but some artists have taken the time to portray what they think she should look like.

Even thought she looks 30 years younger than that of her male version...


Artist creation of a possible female Wd:
http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/community/fanart/?rhtml=y#919

The male version:
http://us.blizzard.com/diablo3/characters/witchdoctor.xml


But then again, look what they did with the barbarian..


Artist creation:
http://lightbulboverhead.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/ss5-hires.jpg

Female barbarian as we know it:

http://us.blizzard.com/diablo3/characters/barbarian.xml


In my personal opinion, i think we could expect to see something more along the lines of this for the female wd:

http://billsmovieemporium.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/the-exorcist.jpg



Apparently all logic is being dismissed here. It's fine, sex appeal in diablo 3 should be reserved for blizzard's golden egg's.

The wizard and the monk...

---

Q u o t e:
Female barbarian as we know it:

---

No, this is the female barbarian as you will know her: http://us.blizzard.com/diablo3/_images/screenshots/ss111-hires.jpg

---

Q u o t e:
Female WD:

http://gza.gameriot.com/content/images/view_321046_1_1230276747.jpg

---

That's about a 100x sexification multiplier on how she actually looks.