Diablo books vs game storyline
by Anilator(a) | 04/01/2011 02:11:29![]() i ve so far read legacy of blood and almost through with the black road and i only see minor similarities in the games vs book. I see no strong relationships worth mentioning. Anyone read the books? what titles are better reads for the gamers? The books ive read though are somewhat interesting. They almost seem like side quests of the diablo world instead of being directly related to the game itself. i guess that isnt such a bad thing thoguh. i dunno |
by Bashiok | 05/01/2011 23:46:05![]() The Sin War trilogy was really the beginning of what is now considered canon for the lore of the series. While the previous books certainly have a lot of great stories, information, and even bits and pieces that may indeed hold true in the series as it is now, they aren't held as canon and thus the events in them may not always hold true moving forward. One specific case where they are being honored though was brought up a while ago on these forums:
That's actually an error we intend to correct with the map and are holding the descriptions from The Black Road as correct. In no way would I consider the books prior to The Sin War trilogy false or not worth reading, I think Diablo fans can still get a lot of pleasure from them, but you can consider them to be... tales, and not necessarily reference material. [ Post edited by Bashiok ] |
by Bashiok | 06/01/2011 03:48:25![]()
http://u (Archive + the three Sin War books and you've got everything) [ Post edited by Bashiok ] |


